Jump to content

Bhuto

Friend of the Knights
  • Posts

    507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Bhuto

  1. Image may contain: outdoor

     

    Royal Bengal Tiger. She was trapped inside a tea garden in darjeeling, westbengal. And i was lucky enough to be around that tea garden at that time and took a pic :) Later she was relocated in the deeper jungle. after putting those collar things

    • Upvote 7
  2. 4 hours ago, Micchan said:

    Only indians and friends care about cricket (also spiderland)


    aussies, kiwi, southafricans , West Indies , and all most all other nations of southasia plays cricket :P 


    isn't @BlackAsLight a aussie ?? he must know about cricket :P 

  3. 6 hours ago, Ryan Miller said:

     

    Isn't that like baseball except with a little bit of golf?


    It is nowhere near baseball or golf though :P completely different with different rules as well. if you think it is simmilar to baseball due to the bats this is for you >>>

    baseball bat: Image result for baseball bat


    Cricket Bat: Image result for cricket bat

    • Upvote 1
  4. 52 minutes ago, Tevron said:


    A bit beside the point, but the US would decimate the Iranian military in a week with air superiority alone. Air combat is the most important type of combat when it comes to destroying an enemy's military. I think you're undervaluing the gap between the US and the rest of the world by a lot.

    you can't take all your airforce in one place in like 1  month like whatever airforce US have they will not move 50% of it to fight iran cause they have other works to do as well like protecting EU, a few other nations, securing homeland and etc. 
     

    Also they as well need a lot big base near iran to do that afganistan will not be that base surely same is for pakistan so alone saudi can't give shelter to this much of airforce. Also there are treaties / foreign relations to prevent US-Iran direct conflict. If US want they might use saudi for proxy war in iran if they sense threat but they will never go for direct war. 

  5. 14 hours ago, Rin said:

    Hard call. I'd say by default it will be white peace. So what matters more is that who would win in a long, brutal, zero infra war. Interestingly, if the question was US vs Iran on Iran home soil, I'd bet on Iran. US doesn't have very good odds of invading Iran without Saudi help.

     

    First, it depends on what exactly you mean by no allied help. Iran has world class homegrown military tech. Without being able to buy allied weapons, Iran wins easily. With allied weapons purchase, Saudi has the cash to get some good American weaponry.

     

    Saudi appears to have better military tradition. Soldiers are a part of their lifestyle; they have no police. And they have had some recent military conflicts, although nothing huge.

     

    But what really matters is how long they can keep the war machine going. Saudi's economy is more unstable, 90% reliant on oil and tourism (pilgrimages). While Saudi is self-sufficient on many parts, Iran has more fertile soil and variety of resources. If both sides face embargoes, Saudi would be completely fucked up. Saudi also has a larger % of economy dedicated to military. Although both maintain about the same size of forces, Saudi's military budget is 8x higher.

     

    So my bet would be on Iran.


    By any chance you did any course on International Relations ?? :P 
    I think this the best explanation possible :)  

  6. depends on which war you mean if it is something like political war then yes ofcourse russia will loose but if it is in the battle ground then EU don't stand a chance russia can take down/invade almost 20-50% of EU in 2 months time period

  7. Well @Rin how can you claim that what we use these days is only form of modernization I mean do you think throwing nuke is a sign of a modernized country (I think modernized is a bit of excess word it can't even be a sign of a civilized country).

    Honestly if this missile/arm race among the nations is a sign of modernization then I don't want to be modernize. 

     

    Spoiler

    But again it is obviously one side of the coin there are a lot of good things modernization provided to us but my question is, 
    Is it really necessary to invade a country to modernize it ?? Also what is the correct definition of modernization according to you ?

     

  8. I mean if manifest destiny was justified then why not the expansion of israel?? 
    They are effectively simmilar like taking other's land by force and staying there just because you are stronger than them.

    (although don't get me wrong I personally never support this nor do I support what India doing in Kashmir those are simmilar things like using your power/technology to do all the bad stuffs) 

  9. 1 hour ago, Floating Hippo said:

    I think I'm a little more interested on what you think of it all considering the Rose - Kastor tie. :P 


    tbh if you ask my opinion lordaeron treaty was like 10 step backward after one step forward (mensa treaty) 
    if mensa include coup of kastor in peace term I think that would be better for lordaeron :P:P 

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...