Jump to content

RagnarBuliwyf

Order - Stoneward
  • Posts

    1,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by RagnarBuliwyf

  1. 6 hours ago, Lancelot said:

    4th one is a cop out since there’s almost no chance of death. I’ll take the gator. Small area and that chain mail is heavy and thick. I’ll jump on it and hope the first few bites won’t penetrate the armor too bad. Once I get a hold of it’s snout I’ll just have to hope I can pin it with the heavy armor. 

    Chain isn't good vs penetration, it's a slash resident armor.

     

    Source

    Got speared through my own. 

     

     

    I think the Grizzley with whoever else I need though. Those 3 spears can be used incredibly well to hurt that bear. Either way though you'll be getting seriously hurt. 

    • Like 1
  2. Depends on what role, what the reasons are and why. I helped offshore 300 roles to East Asia and, financials aside the service provided went up due to coverage. 

     

    But primarily companies offshore as a simple money saving option, which is the wrong way to view it. 

  3. Story time: 

     

    back on PT(obligatory fix PT @Walling)  An alliance I was in, Seven Kingdoms (which I helped re-create here and on o-game) were one of the first to go "Paperless", we originally took it from EVE if my memory serves right as a few of us were playing it back in the day too. 

     

    Paperless, while it sounds great is just someone trying to figure a reason to go attack people without having treaties. "friends helping friends". It makes warfare far more unpredictable, however it does mean those dogpiles tend to happen more often if the paperless alliance is the one doing it. Having experienced it, those alliances which are paperless and are getting dunked on, don't tend to have their "friends" helping them unless there's a treaty there. 

     

     

    A true paperless alliance, when they declare war shouldn't have much more of a reason than "we're bored and wanted to do a few rounds of warfare". Seeing them try to justify their existence (looking at Church) is fucking pathetic. 

     

     

    old man rant over. 

  4. Yes. 

    There are some crimes that should not be redeemable. I'd argue that the way they're handled has lead to their continued activity and depravity. (Sexual assault on a minor/anything pedophilic/any acts of violence on a minor). 

     

    I am that hardline type on it. I must admit, my view is narrow on that area having had to have dealt with it personally in my childhood.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...